Show simple item record Lalumière, Martin L. Rice, M. E. 2007-10-01T15:04:43Z 2007-10-01T15:04:43Z 2007
dc.identifier.citation Lalumière, M. L., & Rice, M. E. (2007) The validity of phallometric assessment with rapists : Comments on Looman & Marshall. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 61-68. en
dc.identifier.issn 1079-0632
dc.identifier.issn 1573-286X
dc.description The original publication is available at en
dc.description.abstract In a recent article Looman and Marshall (2005) questioned the validity of phallometric assessment of rapists based on the results of a study of incarcerated rapists and child molesters. In this commentary we offer (1) a critique of the methods used and conclusions reached by Looman and Marshall and (2) a discussion of important methodological issues relevant to phallometry. We conclude that the correct inference from Looman and Marshall’s study is that rapists, as a group, show a pattern of sexual arousal to audiotaped scenarios of coercive and non-coercive sex that significantly differs from the pattern of groups of non-sex offenders, in agreement with the general literature on this question. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Springer en
dc.subject Sexual excitement en
dc.subject Rapists en
dc.title The validity of phallometric assessment with rapists : Comments on Looman & Marshall en
dc.type Article en
dc.publisher.faculty Arts and Science en
dc.publisher.department Psychology en
dc.description.peer-review Yes en
dc.publisher.institution University of Lethbridge en
dc.publisher.institution McMaster University en

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search OPUS

Advanced Search


My Account