Institutional Repository

Testing the animate monitoring hypothesis / Mitchell LaPointe

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Vokey, John
dc.contributor.author LaPointe, Mitchell
dc.contributor.author University of Lethbridge. Faculty of Arts and Science
dc.date.accessioned 2012-05-10T19:43:55Z
dc.date.available 2012-05-10T19:43:55Z
dc.date.issued 2010
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10133/3054
dc.description xii, 108 leaves ; 29 cm en_US
dc.description.abstract The detection of human and non-human animals and their unique (and potentially dangerous) “animation” would have been important to our ancestors’ survival. It would seem plausible that our ancestors would have required a vigilance above and beyond that dedicated to other, inanimate, objects. Considering the millions of years of expending extra energy to monitor these objects, it would also seem likely, at least as advocated by New, Cosmides, and Tooby (2007), that the human visual system would have developed mechanisms to allocate attention automatically and quickly to these objects. We tested the New et al. (2007) “animate monitoring” hypothesis by presenting viewers with a group of animate objects and a group of inanimate objects using the flicker task—a task that is assumed to be one that measures automatic visual attention. These objects were presented on a variety of backgrounds of natural scenes, including some backgrounds that were contextually inconsistent with the target objects. These objects were also presented in either a consistent location within each scene or a location that violated that consistency. Only people objects were consistently more readily detected, not animated objects in general. Detection in this task was affected by more than just the information provided by the target object. Both results provide a serious challenge to the “animate monitoring” hypothesis. Furthermore, the results were shown not to be due to peculiarities of our stimulus set, or by how interesting the members of each object category were. iv en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Lethbridge, Alta. : University of Lethbridge, Dept. of Psychology, c2010 en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Thesis (University of Lethbridge. Faculty of Arts and Science) en_US
dc.subject Visual perception en_US
dc.subject Attention en_US
dc.subject Dissertations, Academic en_US
dc.title Testing the animate monitoring hypothesis / Mitchell LaPointe en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dc.publisher.faculty Arts and Science en_US
dc.publisher.department Department of Psychology en_US
dc.degree.level Masters


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics