Institutional Repository

Immigration in the U.S.: Should the U.S. take a more or less restrictive approach to immigration?

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Brendel, Sven
dc.date.accessioned 2010-05-06T17:07:40Z
dc.date.available 2010-05-06T17:07:40Z
dc.date.issued 2008-06
dc.identifier.issn 1718-8482
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10133/1217
dc.description.abstract The U.S. is at a crossroads, regarding its immigration policy. Considering the harm principle by John Stuart Mill and the categorical imperative by Immanuel Kant, Americans should not look to a more restrictive approach to immigration unless there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the cost of immigration outweigh its benefits. Yet, empirical evidence suggests that the effects of immigrants on the government budget, crime rates and the wages of working class natives are negligible, while the increases in standard of living experienced by immigrants themselves after moving to the U.S. are not. The slight negative impact on the native population, estimated by some of the studies reviewed, is likely outweighed by the gains made by immigrants. Additionally, the U.S. economy has become dependent upon immigrant labor, further suggesting that there is no basis to support a more restrictive approach. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Lethbridge Undergraduate Research Journal en
dc.subject United States -- Emigration and immigration en
dc.title Immigration in the U.S.: Should the U.S. take a more or less restrictive approach to immigration? en
dc.type Article en
dc.publisher.faculty California State University Monterey Bay (CSUMB) en
dc.publisher.institution California State University Monterey Bay (CSUMB) en

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics