The Community of Research Excellence Development Opportunities (CREDO) program at the University of Lethbridge was launched in 2008 with the aim to build success in SSHRC funding competitions. CREDO provides generous development grants to launch promising new projects in the social sciences (including Education and Management areas), humanities, fine arts, and health sciences disciplines. The CREDO program supports faculty in (1) building a competitive capability profile that helps them gain a strategic edge in external funding competitions and (2) providing outstanding training opportunities for graduate and undergraduate students. Since launching it has supported more than 50 projects with a cumulative investment of over $1.3 million, and nearly $2.1 million awarded by SSHRC to CREDO recipients.
Subject Matter Eligibility
CREDO aims to support research broadly within the scope of SSHRC’s subject matter mandate as well as health research under CIHR’s mandate excluding bio-medical areas. Successful CREDO applicants in the areas of clinical, health services, or social, cultural, environmental and population health research are expected to identify suitable and attainable health research funding opportunities.
Value and Duration
Up to $25,000 is normally available over two annual instalments. The first instalment will be released by April 1 of the academic year (July 1 to June 30) in which the funding is awarded provided that all required certifications are in place. Applicants are advised that the demand for funds normally exceeds the funds available. Extension requests up to one year will be considered.
Tenured and tenure-track faculty with research duties are eligible to apply for CREDO. Applicants at the rank of Assistant Professor or within the first six years of the appointment will normally be considered as emerging researchers in line with SSHRC’s definition. Co-applicants would normally also be tenured or tenure-track faculty at the University of Lethbridge, but other individuals are welcome to participate in such roles where appropriate. ULFA members on term appointments are not eligible to apply. Principal investigators on active external awards are not eligible to apply until the award is completed. Applicants may not hold a CREDO award simultaneously with a ULRF award for a similar or related project. CREDO holders whose rank or affiliation status changes during the term of the award may become ineligible to continue holding the award. Past CREDO holders who seek additional CREDO funding are normally expected to show evidence of successful external funding since the previous award.
How to Apply
Applications are submitted via the Internal Grants Application Form on the Bridge. Please follow the attached checklist and application instructions.
Applications are subject to competitive adjudication and will be reviewed for merit by a cross-disciplinary panel convened on the authority of the Vice-President (Research). (Click here for current membership of the ORIS merit review panel and selection criteria for service.)
The CREDO program broadly emulates the merit review criteria SSHRC uses for Insight Development Grants with select additional subcriteria reserved for health research projects as applicable, as well as an additional sub-criterion that pertains to plans for future funding. The three main criteria are weighted as follows:
|1) Challenge - The Aim and Importance of the Endeavour|
|40% weighting for Established Scholars
50% weighting for Emerging Scholars
|a) Originality, significance and expected contribution to knowledge|
|b) Appropriateness of the literature review|
|c) Appropriateness of the theoretical approach or framework|
|d) Appropriateness of the methods/approach|
|e) Quality of training and mentoring to be provided to students, emerging scholars and other highly qualified personnel, and opportunities for them to contribute|
|f) Potential for the project results to have influence and impact within and/or beyond the social sciences and humanities community|
|g) Health: Research proposal addresses a significant need or gap in health research and/or the health care system|
|2) Feasibility - The Plan to Achieve Excellence|
|20% weighting for Established and Emerging Scholars|
|a) Probability that the objectives will be met within the timeline proposed|
|b) Appropriateness of the requested budget and justification of proposed costs|
|c) Indications of financial and in-kind contributions from other sources, where appropriate|
|d) Quality and appropriateness of knowledge mobilization plans, including for effective dissemination, exchange and engagement with stakeholders within and/or beyond the research community where applicable|
|e) Appropriateness of the strategies for conducting the activity/activities proposed|
|f) Quality of development plans|
|3) Capability – The expertise to succeed|
|40% weighting for Established Scholars
30% weighting for Emerging Scholars
|a) Quality, quantity and significance of past experience and published and/or creative outputs of the applicant and any co-applicants, relative to their roles in the project and their respective stages of career|
|b) Evidence of other knowledge mobilization activities (e.g., films, performances, commissioned reports, knowledge syntheses, experience in collaboration / other interactions with stakeholders, contribution to public debate and media), and of impacts on professional practice, social services and policies, etc.|
|c) Evidence of contributions to the development of talent|
|d) Potential of the applicant/co-applicant to make future contributions|
|e) Health: Experience of the applicant(s) in the proposed area of research and with the proposed methodology|
Applicants are invited to identify and/or exclude prospective referees who can give an appropriate external appraisal of the project’s merits for the ORIS review panel. Referees should not be in a conflict or direct academic relation with the applicant or any member of the project team.
An ORIS merit review panel assesses all eligible applications and makes recommendations to the Vice-President (Research) on whose authority funding decisions are made. The range of outcomes available typically depends on the consensus of the panel (e.g. conditional recommendations). All decisions in a given competition are considered final and no formal appeals mechanism is available. Research & Innovation Services will provide feedback to all applicants in a notice of decision by early March. Recommended revisions for unsuccessful submissions must be shown to have been addressed in subsequent submissions.
Participation in an ORIS-sponsored workshop series on grantwriting is a condition for release of the second instalment of CREDO funding. An interim progress report, submitted online, is also a condition for release of the second instalment of CREDO funding. A final progress report should be completed online within six months of the project’s end date. This report is used for tracking purposes and will include information on training activities, travel, and external funding prospects. It should also address any other conditions specified in the notice of decision. Outstanding progress reports may jeopardize eligibility for other ORIS funding opportunities, such as ULRF or Explore.
For further information and assistance, please contact email@example.com or (403) 317-2869.