The LibQUAL+(TM) survey is a web-based questionaire distributed to Faculty, Graduate Students, and a random sampling of Undergraduate students registered in courses through the Univeristy of Lethbridge. This survey is one of the tools used to evaluate the perceived quality of library services offered to the University Community -- on campus and at a distance.
In 2011, the survey will run February 28 to March 18. Those invited to participate will receive notification and reminders through their University of Lethbridge e-mail.
For more information on the survey, see:
Back to top
If you use the Library, either in person or through the Library's website, you will have an opinion about the quality of the service you receive.
If you don't use the Library, then there are reasons why you don't use these services. Regardless of whether you are or are not a user of the Library's services, we want to hear from you.
The LibQUAL+(TM) survey offers all library users in the University Community a chance to offer feedback and suggestions.
Understanding your perceptions of the Library and its services is the first step to understanding what we are doing well and what we need to focus on.
The University Library employed this survey and other evaluation mesaures to assess library service in 2005, and many changes have been made as a result while we continue to work on others. In 2008 we checked in to make sure we were on track and you told us we were. Now we want to check in again to make sure we continue to respond to your feedback.
Your survey responses are valuable and are important to setting future directions for the Library!
And if you require more incentive...participants who choose to submit their email address with the survey are eligible to win one of five $100 gift certificates from the University bookstore!
Back to top
From the 2005 LibQUAL+(TM) results, twelve recommendations were made. We listened to your feedback and have made several changes in the library since the 2005 survey but it remains a work in progress.
Check out our Report Card below to see the changes made as well as those in progress.
| 1) Recommendation: Communication & Campus Engagement |
|---|
| That the Library seek every opportunity to engage the University community and communicate with it for the purposes of sharing information, presenting a Library perspective on University issues, educating the Community about Library policies, roles and services, making the Community aware of issues and challenges faced, etc. |
What we've done:
|
What we're working on:
Back to top |
| 2) Recommendation: Library Collections & Strategic Directions |
| That the Library engage the University Community, faculty in particular, in a discussion with respect to the strategic directions that the Library faces with respect to collections. |
What we've done:
|
What we're working on:
Back to top |
| 3) Recommendation: Evaluation of Library Collection |
| That the Library undertake an evaluation of its collection. |
What we've done:
|
What we're working on:
Back to top |
| 4) Recommendation: Review Library Documentation & Collection Guidelines |
| That the Library undertake to review the existing assortment of documentation with respect to collection decisions made, the results of the collection evaluation, and the knowledge gathered by engaging faculty in discussion with the express purpose of developing something like a "statement of philosophy" for the Library's collection. |
What we're working on:
Back to top |
| 5) Recommendation: Review Library Space Use & Layout |
| That the Library review the floor plans of the building giving consideration to the layout of service points, services, furniture (tables, carrels, and computers - relative to the noise issue), zoning for noise, improving signage, and demarcatiion of designated areas within the library. |
What we've done:
|
What we're working on:
Back to top |
| 6) Recommendation: Upgrade Library Technology |
| That the University conduct "remedial work" on the Library, taking specific aim at installing electricity on Level 11 East, insulating the group studies and meeting rooms for noise, and expanding the number of computers and the study spaces (quiet, conversational, and group study rooms) to the extent possible. |
What we've done:
|
What we're working on:
Back to top |
| 7) Recommendation: Consider Staff Attitudes |
That each Library staff member honestly reflect on their attitudes towards public service considering:
|
What we've done:
|
| 8) Recommendation: Increase contact time between librarians and students |
| That the Library, the academic librarians in particular, give consideration to reassessing the existing opportunities for student contact with a view to increasing the opportunities for quality contact time with students and considering the role that can be played by faculty. |
What we've done:
|
What we're working on:
Back to top |
| 9) Recommendation: Increase role of the librarians in work of the faculty |
| That the academic librarians, as a group, give consideration to ways that they may play a more prominent role in the work of the faculty. |
What we've done:
|
What we're working on:
Back to top |
| 10) Recommendation: Expand self-serve options |
| That the Library remain cognizant of opportunities to expand the options for self-service. |
What we've done:
|
What we're working on:
Back to top |
| 11) Recommendation: Create Schedule for Library Policy/Procedure Review |
That the Library undertake a schedule of review for the various policies and procedural interpretations of policy with a view to:
|
What we've done:
|
What we're working on:
Back to top |
| 12) Recommendation: Perform Regular Assessment of the Library & Library Services |
| That the Library develop a regular cycle of performing comprehensive survey of the University community every three years using LibQUAL+(TM). |
What we've done:
|
If you have any questions or would like more information, contact: .
Page created and maintained by: